MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High Throughput Screening of Purified Proteins for Enzymatic Activity

2008· article· en· W20779778 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Proudfoot, Ekaterina Kuznetsova, Stephen A. Sanders, Claudio F. González, Greg Brown, A.M. Edwards, C.H. Arrowsmith, Alexander F. Yakunin

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteomeEnzymeBiochemistryProteasesGenomeComputational biologyBiologyFunction (biology)ProteomicsENCODEGeneChemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the functions of every protein in the proteome is one of the great challenges of the postgenomic era. Global genome sequencing efforts revealed that in any genome 30-50% of genes encode proteins with unknown function (hypothetical proteins). To directly test purified hypothetical proteins for catalytic activity, the authors have designed a series of general and specific enzymatic screens. The described screens are designed to detect hydrolases (phosphatases, phosphodiesterases, proteases, and esterases), and oxidoreductases (dehydrogenases and oxidases). The general screens use either general chromogenic substrates or pools of substrates. The positive hits with the model substrates are then tested in the secondary screens with a set of potential natural substrates, or the substrate pools can be deconvoluted to identify the preferred in vitro substrate. The identification of a biochemical activity of a hypothetical protein helps to determine its cellular role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207