MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077986976 · doi:10.1021/cr0206519

Atmospheric Photochemistry via Vibrational Overtone Absorption

2003· review· en· W2077986976 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. J. Donaldson, A. F. Tuck, Veronica Vaida

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Reviews · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of PittsburghNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCitationChemistryComputer scienceLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTAtmospheric Photochemistry via Vibrational Overtone AbsorptionD. J. Donaldson, A. F. Tuck, and Veronica VaidaView Author Information Departments of Chemistry and Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, 80 Saint George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 12, 4717–4730Publication Date (Web):September 4, 2003Publication History Received4 March 2003Published online4 September 2003Published inissue 1 December 2003https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr0206519https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206519research-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2003 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views1159Altmetric-Citations92LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Absorption,Dissociation,Molecules,Photodissociation,Quantum mechanics Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ReviewsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207