MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078022838 · doi:10.1080/08839510701492579

A KEYHOLE PLAN RECOGNITION MODEL FOR ALZHEIMER'S PATIENTS: FIRST RESULTS

2007· article· en· W2078022838 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Bouchard, Sylvain Giroux, Abdenour Bouzouane

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Artificial Intelligence · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à ChicoutimiUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePlan (archaeology)KeyholeArtificial intelligenceCognitive impairmentSet (abstract data type)CognitionCognitive modelMachine learningCognitive psychologyPsychologyProgramming languagePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article addresses the problem of recognizing the behavior of a person suffering from Alzheimer's disease at early-intermediate stages. We present a keyhole plan recognition model, based on lattice theory and action description logic, which transforms the recognition problem into a classification issue. This approach allows us to formalize the plausible incoherent intentions of the patient, resulting from the symptoms of his cognitive impairment, such as disorientation, memory lapse, etc. An implementation of this model was tested in our smart home laboratory, by simulating a set of real case scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Artificial IntelligenceSame topicAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningFrench-language works237,207