MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078038672 · doi:10.1353/frm.2013.0028

Around The Clock : Museum and Market

2013· article· en· W2078038672 on OpenAlex
Erika Balsom

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFramework The Journal of Cinema and Media · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionArt historyVisual artsArtWhite (mutation)PublicityHistoryCartographyGeographyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Around The Clock:Museum and Market Erika Balsom (bio) In fall 2012, visitors to the homepage of the Power Plant, the main venue for contemporary art in Toronto, were greeted with a slideshow featuring the institution’s current exhibitions. The slide devoted to Omer Fast’s Continuous Coverage was typical: it featured a still from the artist’s video Continuity (DE, 2012), one of the primary works on display. When the slide changed and the advertisement for The Clock (2010) came on, something very different filled the screen. Instead of a still from Christian Marclay’s twenty-four-hour video—of, say, a wristwatch—there was a photograph of a long queue of people in a gallery corridor with a sign prominently featured in the foreground of the image: “line up starts here for the clock.” By the time The Clock made its way to the Power Plant, it had been attracting crowds and publicity across Europe and North America for two years. After being first exhibited at the Mason’s Yard location of the White Cube Gallery in London in October 2010, it went on to attract 11,500 visitors to the Paula Cooper Gallery in New York over the course of a month in the dead of winter.1 In the summer of 2011, it won the Golden Lion at the Venice Biennale; in the summer of 2012, it played for six weeks in the David Rubenstein Atrium at Lincoln Center in New York and attracted 18,000 people.2 When The Clock arrived in Toronto it was no longer just an artwork, but rather a phenomenon that had made the rare crossover from the often-insular world of contemporary art to the broader cultural sphere. Some were calling it the first masterpiece of the twenty-first century; devotees were camping out overnight to see what would happen in the wee hours; and one [End Page 177] Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 1. Screen shot of www.thepowerplant.org, taken 21 October 2012. Toronto viewer set out to blog out his repeated visits to see the work in its entirety, even producing a spreadsheet to track his progress.3 The Power Plant recognized all of this in its decision to promote the work on its website with a photograph of a queue: line up here, as people have lined up before you in New York, London, Boston, and Los Angeles. Be prepared to wait; the experience of this artwork is about temporality in more ways than one. Long queues are normally the property of nightclubs or iPhone launches, not gallery installations. But the queue for The Clock fulfills the same function as the queue outside the Apple Store: it endows an experience with an aura of exclusivity and thereby heightens its appeal. It is a visual display of desire that in turn incites desire. Though there is much to be said about the relationship of The Clock to various concepts such as cinematic time, continuity editing, found-footage filmmaking, and cinephilia, the following pages will forego an analysis of the artwork as text to instead interrogate the The Clock as phenomenon. This essay will situate The Clock within the dual context of museum and market—two profoundly interlocking entities undergoing equally profound transformations in the early twenty-first century. In particular, I will situate The Clock as the most significant iteration to date of a variety of artwork that arose in the 1990s and has achieved particular [End Page 178] prominence within the last decade, with significant ramifications for the status of the moving image on the art market: the spectacular—and spectacularly accessible—projected video installation. In 2010, Paula Cooper Gallery and White Cube jointly offered The Clock for sale in a limited edition of six priced at a reported $467,500 each,4 making it one of the most expensive pieces of moving image art ever sold, and perhaps the most expensive ever sold on the primary market.5 Five copies were designated at this price for institutional sales, while the sixth went to hedge fund manager Steve Cohen for an undisclosed but presumably larger sum.6 Major museums including the Boston Museum...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it