MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078039688 · doi:10.1002/pros.21199

Development of metastatic and non‐metastatic tumor lines from a patient's prostate cancer specimen—identification of a small subpopulation with metastatic potential in the primary tumor

2010· article· en· W2078039688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Prostate · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoBC Cancer Agency
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMetastatic tumorMedicineProstate cancerPrimary tumorMetastasisPathologyProstateOncologyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Metastasis is the major cause of prostate cancer deaths. Tumor heterogeneity in both primary and metastatic prostate cancers is a major hurdle in elucidating the mechanisms of metastasis in this disease. To circumvent this obstacle and improve our understanding of prostate cancer metastasis, we developed multiple tumor tissue lines from one patient's primary prostate cancer specimen to examine differences in metastatic ability. METHODS: Pieces of tissue from different foci of a patient's primary prostate tumor were grafted into subrenal capsules of NOD-SCID mice and transplantable tumor sublines were established by serial passage. The metastatic ability of each subline was tested via orthotopic grafting into mice. Chromosomal alterations exclusively presented in a metastatic subline were examined by SKY and investigated for their presence in parental tissues by fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Three transplantable sublines were developed, resembling the primary tumor histologically, exhibiting poor differentiation, and different growth rates. Importantly, the LTL-220N and LTL-221N sublines were non-metastatic, whereas the LTL-220M subline was spontaneously metastatic in vivo. SKY analysis showed limited but unique chromosomal alterations in each subline. Some chromosomal alterations, exclusively present in the metastatic LTL-220M subline, were also observed in a small portion of the parental cancer tissues. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that in primary prostate tumors metastatic potential can be confined to a minority of cancer cells. Subrenal capsule xenograft methodology can be used to dissect heterogeneous cancer cells in a patient's primary tumor and sublines derived from such cells provide valuable tools for investigating mechanisms underlying prostate cancer metastasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it