MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2078042492 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/701/2/1627

TWO RAPIDLY VARIABLE GALACTIC X-RAY TRANSIENTS OBSERVED WITH<i>CHANDRA</i>,<i>XMM-NEWTON</i>, AND<i>SUZAKU</i>

2009· article· he· W2078042492 on OpenAlexaff
C. O. Heinke, John A. Tomsick, F. Yusef‐Zadeh, J. E. Grindlay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languagehe
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSkyStarsBinary numberX-rayObservatoryStar formationAstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have identified two moderately bright, rapidly variable transients in new and archival X-ray data near the Galactic center. Both objects show strong, flaring variability on timescales of tens to thousands of seconds, evidence of N H variability, and hard spectra. XMMU J174445.5−295044 is seen at 2–10 keV fluxes of 3 × 10 −11 to <10 −12 erg cm −2 s −1 , with N H at or above 5 × 10 22 cm −2 , by XMM-Newton , Chandra , and Suzaku . A likely Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) counterpart with K S = 10.2 shows colors indicative of a late-type star. CXOU J174042.0−280724 is a likely counterpart to the fast hard transient IGR J17407−2808. Chandra observations find F X (2–10 keV) ∼10 −12 erg cm −2 s −1 , with large N H variations (from 2 × 10 22 to >2 × 10 23 cm −2 ). No 2MASS counterpart is visible, to K S >13. XMMU J174445.5−295044 seems likely to be a new symbiotic star or symbiotic X-ray binary, while CXOU J174042.0−280724 is more mysterious, likely an unusual low-mass X-ray binary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→