MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078076534 · doi:10.2298/zmsdn1031443p

Possibilities for connection and cooperation with Serbia: Standpoints of new Serbian Diaspora in Canada and the USA

2010· article· en· W2078076534 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Development and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerbianDiasporaSample (material)Work (physics)Field (mathematics)Regional sciencePolitical scienceSociologyPublic relationsGender studiesEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Virtual and real contacts create possibilities for a flow of ideas and information and in that way a so-called a culture of networks is developed, which can multiply contribute, not only to bringing spectrums of new development models together, but also creating new ones, especially in the field of economics. Based on a survey questionnaire which was carried out in 2008 among highly educated persons from Serbia who now live in the USA and Canada (on a sample of 430 respondents), the paper deals with the following: what is the standpoint of our diaspora towards the current socio- economic situation in Serbia, what are their plans for the future regarding life and work, if is it possible to establish cooperation with our highly qualified diaspora, as well as which fields of cooperation could be developed with Serbia and its institutions. .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it