MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Representações do agir publicitário: descrição linguístico textual das instâncias agentivas

2013· article· pt· W2078099896 on OpenAlexaff
Rosalice Pinto, Carla Teixeira

Bibliographic record

VenueLinha D Água · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Linguistic Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este estudo, baseado na perspectiva teórica do Interacionismo Socio-discursivo, centra-se no estudo do papel de algumas instâncias agentivas no gênero textual anúncio publicitário. Primeiramente, objetiva mostrar que o papel destes agentes é diferente conforme o tipo de agir e a prática social em que estes se inserem, podendo vir a ser materializados distintamente neste gênero textual. Em segundo lugar, visa a mostrar que, de acordo com a atividade a que este gênero se interliga, pode-se imaginar a existência de diferentes níveis de atorialidade. Este artigo baseia-se na análise de alguns exemplares do gênero textual anúncio publicitário que circularam em Portugal de 2007 a 2011. Uns exemplos provêm da atividade de benemerência, enquanto que os outros são originários da atividade de produção e comercialização de vinhos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLinha D ÁguaSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207