Representações do agir publicitário: descrição linguístico textual das instâncias agentivas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este estudo, baseado na perspectiva teórica do Interacionismo Socio-discursivo, centra-se no estudo do papel de algumas instâncias agentivas no gênero textual anúncio publicitário. Primeiramente, objetiva mostrar que o papel destes agentes é diferente conforme o tipo de agir e a prática social em que estes se inserem, podendo vir a ser materializados distintamente neste gênero textual. Em segundo lugar, visa a mostrar que, de acordo com a atividade a que este gênero se interliga, pode-se imaginar a existência de diferentes níveis de atorialidade. Este artigo baseia-se na análise de alguns exemplares do gênero textual anúncio publicitário que circularam em Portugal de 2007 a 2011. Uns exemplos provêm da atividade de benemerência, enquanto que os outros são originários da atividade de produção e comercialização de vinhos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".