MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078127993 · doi:10.1109/upinlbs.2012.6409753

Estimating MEMS gyroscope g-sensitivity errors in foot mounted navigation

2012· article· en· W2078127993 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGyroscopeSensitivity (control systems)Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)Convergence (economics)Computer scienceDiagonalExtended Kalman filterArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsElectronic engineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Errors in gyroscope measurements due to linear accelerations are often overlooked in foot mounted navigation systems. Accelerations of foot mounted IMUs can reach 5 g while walking and 10 g while running, but vary depending on the sensors location and mounting. These accelerations are often very short and can induce large biases in the gyro which can produce attitude errors when the measurements are integrated. This paper proposes a real time method for the mitigation of g-sensitivity errors whereby the coefficients are estimated in the navigation Kalman filter. Variations of the estimation scheme are given including estimating the diagonal terms of the 3×3 matrix or all nine elements of the matrix. Accuracy (RMS) improved by 45% and 61% in two data sets using two different sensors in different environments. Convergence rates of the estimated variance are also shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207