MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078136140 · doi:10.7202/1005554ar

“llusions of Absence:” Disappearances, Displacements, and the Limits of Responsibility in The Winter's Tale and The Remains of the Day

2011· article· en· W2078136140 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Susan Bruce

Bibliographic record

VenueIntermédialités Histoire et théorie des arts des lettres et des techniques · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServantSubject (documents)LiteratureJudaismRest (music)IllusionArtHistoryPhilosophyPsychologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay takes for its subject the disappearances of characters from two different texts: Ruth and Sarah, the Jewish servant girls expelled from Darlington Hall in Kazuo Ishiguro's The Remains of the Day, and Mamillius, the heir to Leontes, King of Sicilia, who dies in Act 2 of Shakespeare's The Winter's Tale. These characters are so absolutely erased from the texts in which they so briefly appear that it is as if they have been “disappeared” by them: they become, I argue, quite literally notable by their absence. Denied a presence in the texts, however, such personages do not, as might be expected, simply disappear. They won't quite go away; rather, they lodge instead in the mind of the reader, the pretence of their absence troubling the illusions of closure with which the texts both end. This displacement from textual to mental medium, I maintain, entails ethical consequences for the reader or audience. Unable to lay these ghosts to rest in the way in which the texts' protagonists appear to be able to do, the reader is forced to confront issues of responsibility not by what is present in the text, but by what is not there, or not there any longer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.070
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntermédialités Histoire et théorie des arts des lettres et des techniquesSame topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207