MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078159117 · doi:10.1063/1.1505857

Exactly solvable Ogston model of gel electrophoresis. IX. Generalizing the lattice model to treat high field intensities

2002· article· en· W2078159117 on OpenAlexafffund
Michel G. Gauthier, Gary W. Slater

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsElectric fieldLattice (music)Statistical physicsPhysicsField (mathematics)Quantum mechanicsMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditionally, the Ogston regime is studied solely in the limit of low field intensities. This explains why the theoretical discussion has focused until now on the relative roles of the fractional volume available to the analyte and the subtleties of the gel architecture. Over the past several years, we have developed a lattice model of gel electrophoresis that has allowed us to revisit the fundamental assumptions of the standard Ogston model. In particular, we demonstrated that the fractional free volume is not the relevant parameter for gel sieving. In this article, we continue the development of this model and we generalize our mathematical approach to treat nonvanishing electric field intensities. To do so, we must revisit the way biased random walks are normally modeled by stochastic processes. Straightforward generalizations based on standard Metropolis-like schemes fail at high field intensities. Moreover, our generalization requires the complete decoupling of the spatial directions parallel and perpendicular to the field direction. We show that our novel theoretical approach makes it possible to calculate exact mobilities in the presence of lattice obstacles. Several two-dimensional examples are then studied, including one that includes topological dead ends that act like traps. In the latter case, we recover results very similar to those reported by Serwer et al. [Biopolymers 29, 1863 (1990)] on the trapping electrophoresis of charged spheres in agarose gels. In the absence of such traps, the mobility is shown to be a very weak function of the electric field, thus validating the historical neglect of the field intensity in the development of obstruction models for the Ogston sieving regime of small analytes. Finally, we describe how the present model could be improved to treat more realistic cases and we discuss the problem of the field dependence of the diffusion coefficient during electrophoresis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207