Inelastic performance of screw-connected cold-formed steel strap-braced walls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cold-formed steel, screw-connected strap-braced walls (15 specimens, 2.44 m × 2.44 m each), designed following a capacity-based approach, were tested to evaluate their performance in the inelastic range of behaviour. Gross cross-section yielding of the tension braces was the specified failure mode in the design procedure. Extended tracks and additional shear anchors were installed, such that inelastic deformations would be limited to tension yielding of the braces. Walls without extended tracks were able to reach their yield level; however, damage to other frame elements occurred, thus reducing the ductility level that was attained. Cyclically loaded walls (0.5 Hz) with track extensions showed that wall performance is also dependent on the strain rate experienced by the braces. An Fu / Fy ratio greater than 1.2 is necessary to limit the possibility of brace fracture under seismic loading. Preliminary force modification factors, Rd = 2.0 and Ro = 1.3, are recommended for walls designed and detailed to achieve ductile performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".