MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078164382 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2014.0034

Imperial Authority and Passivity in the South Pacific: George Manville Fenn’s “The Blackbird Trap”

2014· article· en· W2078164382 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michelle Elleray

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHEROGeorge (robot)Context (archaeology)NarrativeHistoryColonialismLawArchaeologyArtLiteraturePolitical scienceArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In George Manville Fenn’s “The Blackbird Trap,” blackbirding—the labor trade operative in the nineteenth-century Pacific—is presented as a form of slavery that imperial authorities are unable to stop, despite Britain’s vaunted anti-slavery stance. The story is anomalous in its publication context of the Boy’s Own Paper , for the boy hero is unable to prevent blackbirding of the Islanders, and the perpetrator is never formally brought to justice. Positioning Fenn’s fictional narrative in the context of historical events and Tracey Banivanua-Mar’s analyses of colonial violence, this article explores how the apparent failures—both of the boy hero and imperial authority—can be read as enabling for the settler nation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicAsian American and Pacific HistoriesFrench-language works237,207