MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Operator algebras for analytic varieties

2014· article· en· W2078183835 on OpenAlexafffund
Kenneth R. Davidson, Christopher Ramsey, Orr Moshe Shalit

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHolomorphic and Operator Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsOperator (biology)Algebra over a fieldPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the isomorphism problem for the multiplier algebras of irreducible complete Pick kernels. These are precisely the restrictions M V \mathcal {M}_V of the multiplier algebra M \mathcal {M} of Drury-Arveson space to a holomorphic subvariety V V of the unit ball B d \mathbb {B}_d . We find that M V \mathcal {M}_V is completely isometrically isomorphic to M W \mathcal {M}_W if and only if W W is the image of V V under a biholomorphic automorphism of the ball. In this case, the isomorphism is unitarily implemented. This is then strengthened to show that when d > ∞ d>\infty every isometric isomorphism is completely isometric. The problem of characterizing when two such algebras are (algebraically) isomorphic is also studied. When V V and W W are each a finite union of irreducible varieties and a discrete variety, when d > ∞ d>\infty , an isomorphism between M V \mathcal {M}_V and M W \mathcal {M}_W

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicHolomorphic and Operator TheoryFrench-language works237,207