MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078188825 · doi:10.1190/1.2792931

Adaptive Gabor imaging using the lateral position error criterion

2007· article· en· W2078188825 on OpenAlexaff
Yongwang Ma, Gary F. Margravé

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition (finance)Computer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new seismic depth migration algorithm using the Gabor transform, also termed as the windowed Fourier transform, over the lateral spatial coordinates and the discrete Fourier transform over time. These transforms enable a wavefield depth extrapolation by laterally variable, frequency and wavenumber dependent, phase shift. The Gabor transform is implemented as a windowed discrete Fourier transform where the windows are confined to form a partition of unity (POU), meaning that they sum to one. For efficiency, an adaptive partitioning scheme that relates window width to the lateral velocity variation is developed, and defines an adaptive Gabor imaging scheme. Within each window, the Gabor method uses the familiar split‐step Fourier technique. The construction of the adaptive partition of unity is guided by an accuracy threshold that constrains the spatial positioning error, for each depth step. The spatial positioning error is estimated by comparing the Gabor method to a nonstationary phase shift that changes according to the local velocity at each position. We present the details of building the adaptive POU for both 2D and 3D imaging. The performance of Gabor depth imaging using this partitioning algorithm is illustrated with imaging results from prestack depth migration of the Marmousi dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207