Charles-Édouard Bourgeois et Gonzalve Poulin. Deux visions différentes des services à l’enfance dans le Québec des années quarante.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une grande effervescence caractérise le Québec des années quarante. La croissance et l'urbanisation massives de la population, de même que les traumatismes engendrés par la crise économique des années trente, entraînent de profonds bouleversements sociaux qui se répercutent sur la vie familiale et la situation des enfants. Dans ce contexte inédit, deux courants de pensée s'affrontent: l'un, traditionaliste, mise sur la consolidation et l'amélioration des institutions en place, très majoritairement dirigées par des religieux; l'autre, moderniste, préconise une plus grande intervention de l'État dans le domaine social et une diversification des services. Les points de vue de l'abbé Bourgeois et du père Poulin illustrent bien ces deux visions, qui trouveront notamment à s'exprimer au sujet de la Loi de la protection de l'enfance de 1944, adoptée sous le gouvernement libéral d'Adélard Godbout, mais subséquemment mise à l'écart sous le gouvernement unioniste de Maurice Duplessis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".