MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078221881 · doi:10.1145/2600694.2600697

Generalized homomorphic MACs with efficient verification

2014· article· en· W2078221881 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Feng Zhang, Reihaneh Safavi–Naini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomomorphic encryptionComputer scienceCorrectnessVerifiable secret sharingMultilinear mapGeneralizationDegree (music)Key (lock)Theoretical computer scienceConstruct (python library)ComputationAlgorithmMathematicsProgramming languageEncryptionComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Homomorphic MACs allow the holder of a secret key to construct authenticators for data blocks such that an untrusted server that computes a function of the data, can also compute an authenticator that can be verified by the key holder, guaranteeing correctness of the computation. Homomorphic MACs that allow verifiable computation of multivariate polynomials of degree ≤ 2 have been proposed by Backes, Fiore and Reischuk (CCS 2013). We generalize their construction such that polynomials of degree l>2 can also be computed. Our generalization uses multilinear map abstraction and has security based on the l-linear assumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207