MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078243343 · doi:10.1063/1.2150264

Photomodification of CdSe nanocrystals incorporated in a poly(butylmethacrylate) polymer film

2006· article· en· W2078243343 on OpenAlexaff
Vitalij Kovalevskij, Vidmantas Gulbinas, Gregory D. Scholes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRayleigh scatteringNanocrystalAbsorption (acoustics)ExcitonWavelengthLaserBlueshiftPolymerMaterials scienceAbsorption bandRelaxation (psychology)ScatteringOptoelectronicsChemistryMolecular physicsOpticsPhotoluminescenceNanotechnologyCondensed matter physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a study of the influence of high intensity laser light on the optical properties and exciton relaxation dynamics in CdSe nanocrystals passivated by tri-n-octylphosphine oxide and dispersed in the optically clear poly(butylmethacrylate) polymer. Sample irradiation by 3ps duration laser pulses at 527nm leads to the blueshift of the maximum of the lowest-energy exciton absorption band and to the disappearance of a long-wavelength absorption slope in the 600–800nm region that we attribute to Rayleigh scattering. The photomodification rate is approximately proportional to the second to third power of the light intensity and strongly temperature dependent. The shift of the absorption band is related to the reduction of the nanocrystal (NC) size. The disappearance of the Rayleigh scatter is explained as a modification of the NC surface ligands and their immediate surroundings due to an increase in the local temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207