MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078260843 · doi:10.1353/utq.2010.0008

Plympton Priory: A House of Augustinian Canons in South-Western England in the Late Middle Ages (review)

2010· article· en· W2078260843 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nicholas Orme

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryMiddle AgesAncient historyArchaeologyClassicsGenealogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Plympton Priory: A House of Augustinian Canons in South-Western England in the Late Middle Ages Nicholas Orme (bio) Allison D. Fizzard . Plympton Priory: A House of Augustinian Canons in South-Western England in the Late Middle Ages. Brill. xx, 290. US$148.00. There were about a thousand religious houses in medieval England, of which only a couple of dozen are famous today, while the rest are known only to scholars and local historians. The lengthy subtitle of Allison Fizzard's book suggests that the author and publishers place Plympton Priory (Devon) into the latter category, but this lack of profile is not altogether deserved. A northern chronicler of 1370 indeed referred to Plympton only as a nameless 'little priory' near Plymouth, in which the [End Page 467] Black Prince rested sick for three months of that year, yet its income of £912 in 1535 made it one of the two richest monasteries in the southwest of England and the third-richest nationally among the houses of its order, the Augustinian canons. A detailed study of Plympton is long overdue. There has to be some disappointment that, as the author confesses, she has not produced 'a complete history of all aspects.' She does not deal with its site and buildings. True, the latter have disappeared above ground, but having written histories of similar houses in Cornwall, I know that some details about them can be gathered from documentary sources as well as from maps of the locality. A plan of the area covered by the monastic precinct and its relationship to the surrounding roads and settlements could be produced without much difficulty. The author is aware of the priory's chief known record, a cartulary now lost from which notes were taken in the seventeenth century, and it would have been useful to have at least a list of the cartulary's contents insofar as they are mentioned in the notes. Dr Fizzard includes tables of the priory's religious possessions and their revenues in 1291 and 1535, but not its temporal possessions, thus depriving the reader of essential information. The priory's clergy are analyzed only in the fourteenth century, not (as could have been done) down to 1539, and there is no list of priors with their dates, for which one has to go to David Smith's Heads of Religious Houses. In these respects the book falls short of giving readers what they require, despite a length of nearly 250 pages. Still, there is much that is useful and new. The author gives a full and careful account of the priory's origins as a pre-Conquest minster and its conversion by Bishop William de Warelwast of Exeter into a priory of Augustinian canons in 1121. She describes the endowments he gave and those of the other benefactors of the priory, with a consideration of their motives as donors. This is followed by accounts of the management of the priory's possessions up to 1400 (again, not pursued beyond that date) and of the challenges faced by the encroachments of the Crown and of local people. The core of the book is thus a constitutional study of endowments and lawsuits. Economic history is not pursued to any great extent, but the author makes useful forays into religious history. She considers the relationships between the priory and its parish churches and chapels, its appointment of clergy to its parish churches, and the prosopography of its canons, including their geographical and social origins (but, as noted, not after 1400). As usual in Augustinian houses, the canons seem to have done little parochial work, although a few of them were granted permission to hold benefices. The final chapter of the book recounts the end of the priory at the Reformation, with an interesting account of the many grants made by the prior shortly before the dissolution of his house in 1539. In what it covers, this is a well-researched [End Page 468] book, clearly told and supported with substantial referencing, two useful maps, and a full index. While regretting its gaps, I welcome it as a valuable addition to the history of the Plymouth area and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207