Perception of the Authenticity of Atayal Woven Handicrafts in Wulai, Taiwan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Indigenous cultures have become increasingly important tourism attractions and the production and sale of handicrafts have become one way in which indigenous peoples and tourists of different types interact. This is the situation in Wulai Township in Taipei County, Taiwan, where indigenous culture has become one among a variety of tourism attractions. The main objectives of this study are three-fold: (1) to explore the perceived authenticity of Atayal woven handicrafts among tourists who visit Wulai; (2) to examine whether or not significant differences exist among tourists to Wulai in their perceptions of the authenticity of Atayal woven handicrafts; and (3) to compare the differences in such perceptions between those on package tours and self-arranged visitors. Analyses of a survey of domestic tourists revealed that significant differences in perceptions exist in association with age, education, and place of residence. Package tour visitors responded more positively than self-arranged tourists concerning the authenticity of Atayal woven handicrafts. Means of enhancing the balance between commodification and authenticity of ethnic culture are suggested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".