MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078272095 · doi:10.1243/0954405011515415

A software environment for flexible manufacturing system control software testing

2001· article· en· W2078272095 on OpenAlexaff
Bi Zhu, Wenjun Zhang, Qiutong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware constructionComputer scienceSoftware developmentSoftware engineeringSystem integration testingSoftware reliability testingSoftwareTask (project management)Petri netSoftware systemVerification and validationReal-time Control System SoftwareEmbedded systemSystems engineeringEngineeringOperating systemDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of flexible manufacturing system (FMS) control software is a complex task in terms of both the hardware and the software. It is therefore an important task to provide testing facilities for FMS control software in the course of its development. This paper reports on the development of an FMS control software testing environment. The architecture of this testing environment is built to make the system open and intelligent. The openness is achieved to allow for the change in requirements, and the intelligence is meant to reduce manual work in software testing. A generic Petri net (GPN) model representing the behaviour of an FMS is introduced. A set of algorithms for detecting faults in the operation of an FMS control software program is proposed on the basis of the GPN model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering ManufactureSame topicPetri Nets in System ModelingFrench-language works237,207