Heme oxygenase 1 is expressed in murine erythroid cells where it controls the level of regulatory heme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heme is essential for the function of all aerobic cells. However, it can be toxic when it occurs in a non-protein-bound form; cells maintain a fine balance between heme synthesis and catabolism. The only physiological mechanism of heme degradation is by heme oxygenases (HOs). The heme-inducible isoform, HO-1, has been extensively studied in numerous nonerythroid cells, but virtually nothing is known about the expression and potential significance of HO-1 in developing red blood cells. We have demonstrated that HO-1 is present in erythroid cells and that its expression is upregulated during erythroid differentiation. Overexpression of HO-1 in erythroid cells impairs hemoglobin synthesis, whereas HO-1 absence enhances hemoglobinization in cultured erythroid cells. Based on these results, we conclude that HO-1 controls the regulatory heme pool at appropriate levels for any given stage of erythroid differentiation. In summary, our study brings to light the importance of HO-1 expression for erythroid development and expands our knowledge about the fine regulation of hemoglobin synthesis in erythroid cells. Our results indicate that HO-1 plays an important role as a coregulator of the erythroid differentiation process. Moreover, HO-1 expression must be tightly regulated during red blood cell development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".