Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early life environment and maternal care can have long-lasting effects on behavior and physiology. Previously, we found that compared to mother-reared (MR) female rats, rats reared without mothers, siblings, and nest, through artificially rearing (AR), show reduced levels of maternal behavior when they grow up. These effects can be reversed if AR pups are provided with extra "licking-like" tactile stimulation during the preweaning period [Gonzalez et al. [2001] Developmental Psychobiology, 38(1), 11-42]. We also found that AR rats are more action impulsive and have reduced attentional capacities in comparison to their MR siblings [Lovic, Fletcher, & Fleming, in preparation; Lovic & Fleming [2004] Behavioural Brain Research 148: 209-219]. However, it is unknown whether increased impulsivity contributes to reduced levels of maternal behaviors. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between impulsivity and maternal behavior in AR and MR rats. Female rats were reared with (MR) or without mothers (AR) and half of the AR rats received additional stroking stimulation. As adults, AR and MR rats were mated and maternal behavior towards their own pups was assessed. In addition, rats were assessed on impulsive action (differential reinforcement of low-rate schedule; DRL-20s). Consistent with previous findings, AR rats were both less maternal and more action impulsive than MR rats. Partial correlations revealed that impulsivity was inversely related to pup licking-impulsive rats were less maternal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it