Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation regulates heat shock factor-1 activity and the heat shock response in murine fibroblasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1)-dependent poly(ADP-ribose) formation is emerging as a key regulator of transcriptional regulation, even though the targets and underlying molecular mechanisms have not yet been clearly identified. In this study, we gathered information on the role of PARP-1 activity in the heat shock response of mouse fibroblasts. We show that DNA binding of heat shock factor (HSF)-1 was impaired by PARP-1 activity in cellular extracts, and was higher in PARP-1(-/-) than in PARP-1+/+ cells. No evidence for HSF-1 poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation or PARP-1 interaction was found, but a poly(ADP-ribose) binding motif was identified in the transcription factor amino acid sequence. Consistent with data on HSF-1, the expression of heat-shock protein (HSP)-70 and HSP-27 was facilitated in cells lacking PARP-1. Thermosensitivity, however, was higher in PARP-1(-/-) than in PARP-1+/+ cells. Accordingly, we report that heat-shocked PARP-1 null fibroblasts showed an increased activation of proapoptotic JNK and decreased transcriptional efficiency of prosurvival NF-kappaB compared with wild-type counterparts. The data indicate that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation finely regulates HSF-1 activity, and emphasize the complex role of PARP-1 in the heat-shock response of mammalian cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".