Three-Phase Pore-Network Modelling for Mixed-Wet Carbonate Reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Carbonate reservoirs have structural heterogeneities (triple porosity: pore-vug-fracture) and are mixed-to oil-wet. The interplay of structural and wettability heterogeneities impacts the sweep efficiency and oil recovery. The choice of an IOR or EOR process and the prediction of oil recovery requires a sound understanding of the fundamental controls on fluid flow in mixed-to oil-wet carbonate rocks and physically robust flow functions, i.e. relative permeability and capillary pressure functions. Obtaining these flow functions is a challenging task, especially when three fluid phases coexist. In this work we use pore-network modelling, a reliable and physically-based simulation tool, to predict three-phase flow functions. We have developed a new pore-scale network model for rocks with variable wettability. Unlike other models, this model comprises a novel thermodynamic criterion for formation and collapse of oil layers. The new model hence captures film/layer flow of oil adequately which impacts the oil relative permeability at low oil saturation and hence the accurate prediction of residual oil. Pore-networks extracted from pore-space reconstruction methods and CT images have been used as input for our simulations and the model comprises a constrained set of parameters that can be tuned to mimic the wetting state of a given reservoir. We have validated our model with available experimental data for a range of wettabilities. A sensitivity analysis has been carried out to investigate the dependency of relative permeabilities on layer collapse and film/layer flow under various wetting conditions. Additionally, WAG injection has been simulated with different lengths of so-called multi-displacement chains and different flood end-points. The flow functions generated by our model can be passed to the next scales (upscaling) to predict the oil recovery at the reservoir scale and we demonstrate this using a proof-of-concept study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".