MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078386677 · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.15.0243

Locally Advanced and Inflammatory Breast Cancer

2008· review· en· W2078386677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen Chia, Sandra M. Swain, David R. Byrd, David A. Mankoff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCitationBreast cancerClinical OncologyInflammatory breast cancerCancerLibrary scienceFamily medicineOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article Tools Review Articles Article Tools OPTIONS & TOOLS Export Citation Track Citation Add To Favorites Rights & Permissions COMPANION ARTICLES No companion articles ARTICLE CITATION DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.15.0243 Journal of Clinical Oncology - published online before print September 22, 2016 PMID: 18258987 Locally Advanced and Inflammatory Breast Cancer Stephen ChiaxStephen ChiaSearch for articles by this author , Sandra M. SwainxSandra M. SwainSearch for articles by this author , David R. ByrdxDavid R. ByrdSearch for articles by this author , David A. MankoffxDavid A. MankoffSearch for articles by this author Show More From the Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; and Departments of Surgery and Radiology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and University of Washington, Seattle, WA https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.15.0243 First Page Full Text PDF Figures and Tables © 2008 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations178
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesFrench-language works237,207