Analysis and reinterpretation of deformation features in the Rouge River valley, Scarborough, Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Geometry and timing of deformation affecting Ordovician bedrock and overlying Pleistocene sediments in the Rouge River valley near Scarborough, Ontario, are analysed to evaluate whether or not the structures are a result of glacial action or neotectonic activity. Extensive data on local and regional ice-flow directions are used to evaluate the kinematic compatibility between the observed faults and folds and the local ice-flow directions. Jointing and multiple episodes of faulting affect both the Ordovician bedrock and the overlying Pleistocene sediments. At one site, the bedrock is displaced by a normal fault by a minimum of 1.2 m. Crosscutting relationships constrain the majority of the faulting in the Rouge River valley as being coeval with deposition of the lower Bowmanville till during the Nissouri phase (ca. 2315 ka), and possibly younger at one locality. The youngest regional ice-flow direction is northwestward; however, local ice-flow directions are highly variable. This can be explained by local perturbation enhanced by the presence of drumlinoid features in the area. Most deformation features are compatible with local and regional ice-flow directions. Glaciotectonic ice-push and ice-thrust deformation affected the Thorncliffe Formation after about 23 ka. Although some faults appear to be kinematically incompatible with ice-flow directions, six boreholes drilled to 52 m depth revealed only minor vertical offsets of bedrock strata in the uppermost 20 m, and an absence of obvious fault offsets deeper, precluding the possibility that the faults observed in the surface exposures were caused by deep-seated neotectonic stresses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".