MétaCan
Menu
← all works

LINKS BETWEEN LONG‐LIVED HOT SPOTS, MANTLE PLUMES, D″, AND PLATE TECTONICS

2004· article· en· 203 citations· W2078417878 on OpenAlex· 10.1029/2003rg000144

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Full frame distilled prediction

Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

Candidate categories
none
Consensus categories
none
Domain
Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
Study design
Candidate signal: ObservationalConsensus signal: none
Genre
Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score
0.521
Threshold uncertainty score
0.953
Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated · codex-gemma-dda1882f352a

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread
0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

The existence, spatial distribution, and style of volcanism on terrestrial planets is an expression of their internal dynamics and evolution. On Earth a physical link has been proposed between hot spots, regions with particularly persistent, localized, and high rates of volcanism, and underlying deep mantle plumes. Such mantle plumes are thought to be constructed of large spherical heads and narrow trailing conduits. This plume model has provided a way to interpret observable phenomena including the volcanological, petrological, and geochemical evolution of ocean island volcanoes, the relative motion of plates, continental breakup, global heat flow, and the Earth's magnetic field within the broader framework of the thermal history of our planet. Despite the plume model's utility the underlying dynamics giving rise to hot spots as long‐lived stable features have remained elusive. Accordingly, in this review we combine results from new and published observational, analog, theoretical, and numerical studies to address two key questions: (1) Why might mantle plumes in the Earth have a head‐tail structure? (2) How can mantle plumes and hot spots persist for large geological times? We show first that the characteristic head‐tail structure of mantle plumes, which is a consequence of hot upwellings having a low viscosity, is likely a result of strong cooling of the mantle by large‐scale stirring driven by plate tectonics. Second, we show that the head‐tail structure of such plumes is a necessary but insufficient condition for their longevity. Third, we synthesize seismological, geodynamic, geomagnetic, and geochemical constraints on the structure and composition of the lowermost mantle to argue that the source regions for most deep mantle plumes contain dense, low‐viscosity material within D″ composed of partial melt, outer core material, or a mixture of both (i.e., a “dense layer”). Fourth, using results from laboratory experiments on thermochemical convection and new theoretical scaling analyses, we argue that the longevity of mantle plumes in the Earth is a consequence of the interactions between plate tectonics, core cooling, and dense, low‐viscosity material within D″. Conditions leading to Earth‐like mantle plumes are highly specific and may thus be unique to our own planet. Furthermore, long‐lived hot spots should not a priori be anticipated on other terrestrial planets and moons. Our analysis leads to self‐consistent predictions for the longevity of mantle plumes, topography on the dense layer, and composition of ocean island basalts that are consistent with observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
Reviews of Geophysics
Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Field
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Canadian institutions
University of Toronto
Funders
not available
Keywords
GeologyHotspot (geology)GeophysicsMantle (geology)Plate tectonicsMantle plumeMantle convectionVolcanismPlumeGeodynamicsEarth's magnetic fieldTectonicsLithospherePaleontologyMagnetic fieldPhysics
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes