Vision-based context and height estimation for 3D indoor location
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today's smartphones are powerful devices whose continually increasing processing power and wide array of sensors make them well suited for use as personal navigation devices. In the absence of information from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), the onboard inertial sensors can be used to provide a relative navigation solution. However, these onboard inertial sensors suffer from the effects of different sensor errors which cause the inertial-only solution to deteriorate rapidly. As such, there is a need to constrain the inertial positioning solution when long term navigation is needed. GNSS positions and velocities, and WiFi positions are the most important forms of updates available for the inertial solution. However, updates from these two sources depend on external signals and may not always be available. A rich source of information about the outside world can be obtained using the device's camera. Nearly all devices have at least one camera which has thus far been largely neglected as a navigation aid for these mobile devices. There are many indoor scenarios that require accurate height estimates. Traditionally, barometers have been used to provide height information. However, not all mobile devices that are equipped with inertial sensors are also equipped with a barometer. As nearly all devices are equipped with at least one camera, it is our aim to use information from the camera to aid the inertial-only solution with appropriate height estimates. Different pattern analysis techniques are used to identify the different scenarios. The results are presented for the following common use cases: (1) single floor texting mode, (2) stairs texting mode, (3) single floor calling mode, (4) stairs calling mode, and (5) fidgeting the phone while standing still on a single floor (i.e. “fidgeting”). For each of these use cases, first the context will be determined and then the relevant information will be used to calculate the height accordingly. This work is patent pending.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".