Optimal control on Lie groups and integrable Hamiltonian systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Control theory, initially conceived in the 1950’s as an engineering subject motivated by the needs of automatic control, has undergone an important mathematical transformation since then, in which its basic question, understood in a larger geometric context, led to a theory that provides distinctive and innovative insights, not only to the original problems of engineering, but also to the problems of differential geometry and mechanics. This paper elaborates the contributions of control theory to geometry and mechanics by focusing on the class of problems which have played an important part in the evolution of integrable systems. In particular the paper identifies a large class of Hamiltonians obtained by the Maximum principle that admit isospectral representation on the Lie algebras $$\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{p} \oplus \mathfrak{k}$$ of the form $$\frac{{dL_\lambda }} {{dt}} = \left[ {\Omega _\lambda ,L_\lambda } \right]L_\lambda = L_\mathfrak{p} - \lambda L_\mathfrak{k} - \left( {\lambda ^2 - s} \right)A, L_\mathfrak{p} \in \mathfrak{p}, L_\mathfrak{k} \in \mathfrak{k}.$$ The spectral invariants associated with L λ recover the integrability results of C.G.J. Jacobi concerning the geodesics on an ellipsoid as well as the results of C. Newmann for mechanical problem on the sphere with a quadratic potential. More significantly, this study reveals a large class of integrable systems in which these classical examples appear only as very special cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it