Bibliographic record
Abstract
Control theory, initially conceived in the 1950’s as an engineering subject motivated by the needs of automatic control, has undergone an important mathematical transformation since then, in which its basic question, understood in a larger geometric context, led to a theory that provides distinctive and innovative insights, not only to the original problems of engineering, but also to the problems of differential geometry and mechanics. This paper elaborates the contributions of control theory to geometry and mechanics by focusing on the class of problems which have played an important part in the evolution of integrable systems. In particular the paper identifies a large class of Hamiltonians obtained by the Maximum principle that admit isospectral representation on the Lie algebras $$\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{p} \oplus \mathfrak{k}$$ of the form $$\frac{{dL_\lambda }} {{dt}} = \left[ {\Omega _\lambda ,L_\lambda } \right]L_\lambda = L_\mathfrak{p} - \lambda L_\mathfrak{k} - \left( {\lambda ^2 - s} \right)A, L_\mathfrak{p} \in \mathfrak{p}, L_\mathfrak{k} \in \mathfrak{k}.$$ The spectral invariants associated with L λ recover the integrability results of C.G.J. Jacobi concerning the geodesics on an ellipsoid as well as the results of C. Newmann for mechanical problem on the sphere with a quadratic potential. More significantly, this study reveals a large class of integrable systems in which these classical examples appear only as very special cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".