MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078434950 · doi:10.3109/02688697.2013.798854

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of multiple lower-extremity nerve decompression in diabetic peripheral neuropathy

2013· article· en· W2078434950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Neurosurgery · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeripheral neuropathyNerve conduction velocityDecompressionSurgeryPeripheralStatistical significanceNerve conduction studyDiabetes mellitusAnesthesiaNerve conductionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of high-resolution ultrasonography and neural electrophysiology in early diagnosis, operative opportunity selection, and clinical effect assessment of DPN. METHODS: Five hundred and sixty patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) were treated with DELLON surgical nerve decompression in our hospital in the past 5 years. Before and after 18 months surgery, the tests of the Toronto clinical scoring system, high-resolution ultrasonography, QST, and Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV) were evaluated in all cases. The control group included 40 diabetic patients in the same age range but without DPN. RESULTS: Ultrasonographic images revealed an apparently normal proximal common peroneal nerve, tibial nerve marked swelling, enlarged, and hypoechogeneity with loss fascicular pattern. The cross-sectional-area, anteroposterior and transverse diameter were measured preoperative and prooperative, and the differences had statistical significance (P < 0.01). NCV-positive cases amount to 74.9% DPN patients in this study and QST-positive cases amount to 90.9% and had significant differences between them (P < 0.05). Postoperative NCV and cold perception threshold significantly increased (P < 0.05) compared with that of the before surgery. Postoperative warm perception threshold (P < 0.01) and vibration perception threshold (P < 0.05) were significantly lower than the preoperative value. NCV was positively correlated with cold perception threshold (r = 0.395, P < 0.01), and negatively correlated with warm perception threshold (r = - 0.387, P < 0.01) and vibratory perception threshold (r = - 0.367, P < 0.01). The preoperative TCSS score was 19 points for all the cases, and 420 cases (75%) improved to 10-13 points (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is capable of depicting these nerves morphological information, with respect to exact location, course, and extent. QST is suitable for early diagnosis of DPN, and abnormal QST is an indication of lower extremity nerve decompression for DPN. The joint use of QST and NCV testing helps surgeons to grasp the timing of surgery. High-resolution ultrasound, QST and NCV testing can also be used as an outcome index for surgical treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it