MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2078442154 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/732/2/124

<i>AKARI</i>NEAR-INFRARED SPECTRAL OBSERVATIONS OF SHOCKED H<sub>2</sub>GAS OF THE SUPERNOVA REMNANT IC 443

2011· article· en· W2078442154 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupernova remnantSpectral lineEmission spectrumPopulationSupernovaSpectral indexThermalNear-Earth supernova

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present near-infrared (2.5–5.0 μm) spectra of shocked H 2 gas in the supernova remnant IC 443, obtained with the satellite AKARI . Three shocked clumps—known as B, C, and G—and one background region were observed, and only H 2 emission lines were detected. Except in clump B, the extinction-corrected level population shows the ortho-to-para ratio of ∼3.0. From the level populations of clumps C and G—both the one obtained with AKARI and the one extended with previous mid-infrared observations—we found that the υ = 0 levels are more populated than the υ>0 levels at a fixed level energy, which cannot be reproduced by any combination of H 2 gas in local thermodynamic equilibrium. The populations are described by the two-density power-law thermal admixture model, revised to include the collisions with H atoms. We attributed the lower ( n (H 2 )=10 2.8 –10 3.8 cm −3 ) and higher ( n (H 2 )=10 5.4 –10 5.8 cm −3 ) density gases to the shocked H 2 gas behind C-type and J-type shocks, respectively, based on several arguments including the obtained high H i abundance n (H i )/ n (H 2 ) = 0.01. Under the hierarchical picture of molecular clouds, the C-type and J-type shocks likely propagate into "clumps" and "clouds" (interclump media), respectively. The power-law index b of 1.6 and 3.5, mainly determined by the lower density gas, is attributed to the shock-velocity diversity, which may be a natural result during shock–cloud interactions. According to our results, H 2 υ = 1 → 0 S (1) emission is mainly from J shocks propagating into interclump media. The H 2 emission was also detected at the background region, and this diffuse H 2 emission may originate from the collisional process in addition to ultraviolet photon pumping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→