MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078467113 · doi:10.3137/ao.460304

Locally generated tsunamis recorded on the coast of British Columbia

2008· article· en· W2078467113 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alexander B. Rabinovich, Richard E. Thomson, В. В. Титов, F. Stephenson, Garry C. Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Hydrographic ServiceGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersU.S. Geological SurveyNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsSeismologyGeologyTide gaugeSubductionHarbourShoreOceanographyTsunami earthquakeTsunami waveBathymetrySea levelTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents analyses and numerical simulations of local tsunamis generated by two recent earthquakes off the coast of British Columbia. The Queen Charlotte Islands earthquake (Mw = 6.1) on 12 October 2001 generated waves that were recorded by tide gauges at Bamfield, Tofino, Winter Harbour and Port Hardy on the coast of Vancouver Island, with maximum measured wave heights of 11.3, 18.2, 22.7 and 14.5 cm, respectively. The Explorer Plate earthquake off Vancouver Island (Mw = 6.6) on 2 November 2004 generated waves recorded only at Bamfield and Tofino, with lower heights of 7.5 cm and 10.8 cm, respectively. The generation of tsunamis by these moderate, Mw = 6.1–6.6, local earthquakes suggests the possibility of destructive tsunamis from local sources other than the Cascadia Subduction Zone. This, in turn, has implications for tsunami hazards for this seismically active region of coastal North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207