A chiral [2]catenane self-assembled from meso-macrocycles of palladium(ii)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reaction of trans-[PdX2(SMe2)2](X = Cl or Br) with the chiral ligand LL = 1,1'-binaphthyl-2,2'-(NHC(= O)-3-C5H4N)2 gave the [2]catenane complexes trans-[{(PdX2)2(micro-LL)2}2], which are formed by self-assembly from 4 units each of trans-PdX2 and LL. The catenation is favored by the formation of multiple hydrogen bonds between the constituent macrocycles (4 x NHClPd, 2 x NHO double bond C). If the ligand LL is racemic, each macrocycle trans-[(PdX2)2(micro-LL)2] is formed in the meso form trans-[(PdX2)2(micro-R-LL)(micro-S-LL)] but the resulting [2]catenane is chiral as a direct result of the catenation step. This is the first time that this form of chiral [2]catenane has been observed. The enantiomers of the [2]catenane further self-assemble in the crystalline form, through secondary intermolecular PdX bonding, to form a racemic infinite supramolecular polymer of [2]catenanes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".