Periodic unit cell reconstruction of porous media: Application to open-cell aluminum foams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the issue of reconstructing an idealized periodic unit cell (PUC) to represent a porous medium is examined by means of microcomputed tomography (μCT). Using μCT, three-dimensional images of open-cell foam are collected and used to characterize the representative parameters of its cellular morphology. These parameters are used in order to reconstruct the porous medium by means of an idealized PUC: a tetrakaidecahedron with ligaments of triangular cross sections, whose characteristic dimensions have been measured on the μCT images. The proposed reconstruction of the idealized PUC is applied to four aluminum foams. The averaged macroscopic properties of the foams (open porosity and thermal characteristic length) are deduced from their respective PUC model and compared to experimental measurements and literature data. Good correlations are obtained. For each of the foams, this provides a parameterized idealized periodic unit cell on which the partial differential equations governing sound dissipation and propagation in foams can be solved with a view to studying the microphysical basis of the acoustical macrobehavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it