Hypoalbuminemia in Patients Receiving Cisplatin: Correlation between Liver Platinum and Decrease in Serum Albumin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We evaluated changes in serum albumin concentrations in 15 patients with advanced malignancy who were also receiving cisplatin. All 15 patients had serial measurements of serum albumin. The decrease in serum albumin from the time of the first dose of cisplatin to death correlated with liver platinum levels at autopsy (r = 0.46, p less than 0.05). The decrease in serum albumin concentration associated with liver platinum concentration of less than or equal to 1.5 micrograms/g was 0.16 +/- 0.23 g/dl (range 0-0.6). The decrease associated with liver platinum concentrations of greater than 1.5 micrograms/g was 1.0 +/- 0.45 g/dl (range 0.5-1.9; p less than 0.02). The decrease in serum albumin may be secondary to a hepatotoxic effect of cisplatin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".