MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078526275 · doi:10.1109/pvsc.2013.6744504

Optical characterization of selectively transparent and conducting photonic crystals for use in thin crystalline silicon photovoltaics

2013· article· en· W2078526275 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew G. Flood, Kevin Boyd, Zahidur Chowdhury, Paul G. O’Brien, R. N. Kleiman, Nazir P. Kherani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSiliconReflector (photography)PhotovoltaicsPhotocurrentOptoelectronicsCrystalline siliconAbsorption (acoustics)Layer (electronics)Reflection (computer programming)Photonic crystalOpticsAluminiumPhotovoltaic systemNanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential use of selectively transparent and conducting photonic crystals (STCPCs) made of ITO and silica nanoparticles as rear reflectors in 10 μm crystalline silicon (c-Si) photovoltaics (PV) have been explored. Optical simulations comparing the performance of STCPC-reflectors and aluminum reflectors have been performed. The STCPCs outperform aluminum reflectors deposited on the crystalline silicon surface, but exhibit significantly lower reflectivity than the case where a substantial silica film layer is included between the aluminum reflector and the c-Si absorber. However, solar cells using STCPCs as the rear-reflector are capable of generating a significant amount of photocurrent from rear illumination in bifacial PV. An STCPC has been fabricated on a 10 μm c-Si membrane and the reflection and transmission spectral measurements demonstrate the expected increase in absorption in the red-to-NIR range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207