MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078549882 · doi:10.1109/vcip.2014.7051560

GPU-aided real-time image/video super resolution based on error feedback

2014· article· en· W2078549882 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInterpolation (computer graphics)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionConvolution (computer science)Compensation (psychology)PixelSub-pixel resolutionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionProcess (computing)Image resolutionResolution (logic)Image (mathematics)Image processingDigital image processingArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Super resolution is a process to generate high-resolution images from their low-resolution versions. In many applications such as super-HD (4K) TV, super resolution has to be performed in real time. In this paper we propose a real-time image/video super-resolution algorithm, which achieves good performance at low computational cost via off-line learning of interpolation errors in different pixel contexts. The proposed algorithm consists of three stages: fast edge-guided interpolation to generate an initial HR estimation, GPU-aided de-convolution, and error feedback compensation. All three stages can be implemented with GPU to support real-time applications. Experiments demonstrate the competitive performance of the new real-time super-resolution algorithm in both PSNR and visual quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207