Pre-, syn-, and post-imbrication deformation of carbonate slices along the southern Quebec Appalachian front – implications for hydrocarbon exploration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thrust-imbricated shelf-carbonate slices form a wide but poorly understood part of the southernmost Quebec Appalachian structural front. Comprehensive structural analysis of two slices exposed at surface, the Saint-Dominique and Philipsburg slices, shows that pre- and post-imbrication structures are important in defining the final architecture of the slices. The dominant structural style is characterized by thrusts and associated asymmetrical folds, tear faults, oblique ramps and incipient backthrusts developed during WNW–ESE shortening. A forward-breaking (piggy-back) sequence of thrusting is recognised, as well as minor out-of-sequence thrusting. The complexity and diversity of contractional structures is directly influenced by lithology (bed thickness and shale content). Bedding-parallel slip planes are important in the concentration (activation and reactivation) of deformation, in that there are the loci for veining, faulting, and folding. Recognition of lithostructural units provides guidelines for the identification of sub-seismic-scale structural traps in subsurface investigations. Extensional structures (normal faults, veins, tension gashes) are found within all carbonate slices, as well as within the footwall of their basal thrusts. Only a few pre-imbrication normal faults have been identified, one of which is a growth fault. Post-imbrication extensional structures are linked with strain relaxation after overthrusting. A widespread front-parallel strike-slip faulting event postdates all other structural features and can have a major impact on the compartmentalization of potential hydrocarbon reservoirs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".