MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P2-S5.07 Cost of the Avahan HIV prevention programme for high risk groups: results from 23 districts from four southern states in India

2011· article· en· W2078570976 on OpenAlex
Sudha Chandrashekar, Anna Vassall, B. Narayan Reddy, Govindraj Shetty, Michel Alary, Peter Vickerman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Environmental healthFamily medicineSocioeconomicsOptometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background It is estimated that 2.27 million people are living with HIV or AIDS in India. The epidemic is concentrated and predominately driven by marginalised groups. The Avahan Programme in India is one of the largest HIV prevention programmes targeted at high risk populations within a single country in the world. It provides grants to state lead partners (SLPs), who in turn provide grants to non-government organsiations (NGOs) at the district level to deliver multi-component interventions (including peer outreach, STI services, and structural interventions). This study presents the costs of implementing these interventions to female sex workers, men who have sex with men and transgender from 23 districts in the four Southern states of India over 4 years. Methods Financial and economic costs were prospectively collected. Costs by input and activity, unit costs of interventions between 2004 and 2008 were analysed. Economic costs are presented in US $ 2008 using 3% discount rate. Results The total economic cost of the intervention over 4 years for 23 districts was US$ 27 341 121(range per district US$307 597–US$3 147 790) for an estimated target population of 93 345. In year 4, the average annual economic cost per estimated population at the NGO level across the 23 districts was US$70 (US$30–174). The average annual financial cost at current prices was US$59. Over the four years, at the NGO level, capital costs accounted for 10% of total costs. The main recurrent costs were personnel costs (46%) and the materials and supplies for sexually transmitted infections (STI) services (13%). Examining both SLP and NGO costs, programme management, information and grant management costs activities accounted for 27% of total cost; followed by capacity building (20%), STI services (19%), peer outreach (including behaviour change communication, condom provision) (16%) and structural interventions (11%). The proportion of cost that was spent on direct services such as peer outreach and STI services increased as the programme scaled up. Costs for structural activities also increased from 5% in year 1 to 11% by year 4. Conclusions Assessing costs over the life of the project helps to identify how costs vary with the changing needs and strategies of the programme. We will conduct further analysis to examine which factors most influence costs (local price/wages, programme intensity, community involvement etc). This cost data can assist the realistic planning of large scale long term HIV prevention programmes in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it