MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078639096 · doi:10.1115/icone17-76010

Supercritical Water Heat-Transfer Correlation for Vertical Bare Tubes

2009· article· en· W2078639096 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupercritical fluidHeat transferConvective heat transferHeat fluxCritical heat fluxThermodynamicsHeat transfer coefficientMaterials scienceConvectionNTU methodMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an analysis of heat transfer to supercritical water in bare vertical tubes. A large set of experimental data, obtained in Russia, was analyzed and an updated heat-transfer correlation for supercritical water was developed. This experimental dataset was obtained within conditions similar to those for proposed SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR) concepts. Thus, the new correlation presented in this paper can be used for preliminary heat-transfer calculations in SCWR fuel channels. The experimental dataset was obtained for supercritical water flowing upward in a 4-m-long vertical bare tube. The data was collected at pressures of about 24 MPa for several combinations of wall and bulk-fluid temperatures that were below, at, or above the pseudocritical temperature. The values for mass flux ranged from 200–1500 kg/m2s, for heat flux up to 1250 kW/m2 and inlet temperatures from 320 to 350°C. Previous study (Pioro et al., 2008) confirmed that there are three heat-transfer regimes for forced convective heat transfer to water flowing inside tubes at supercritical pressures: (1) Normal heat-transfer regime; (2) Deteriorated heat-transfer regime, characterized by lower than expected heat transfer coefficients (HTCs) (i.e., higher than expected wall temperatures) than in the normal heat-transfer regime; and (3) Improved heat-transfer regime with higher-than-expected HTC values, and thus lower values of wall temperature within some part of a test section compared to those of the normal heat-transfer regime. The HTC data were compared to those values calculated with the Dittus-Boelter and Bishop et al. correlations. The comparison showed that the Bishop et al. correlation represents more closely HTC profiles along the heated length of the tube than the Dittus-Boelter correlation. The latter correlation deviates significantly from experimental data within the pseudocritical range. However, outside the pseudocritical region, the Dittus-Boelter correlation can predict closely experimental HTCs. It should be noted that neither of these correlations can be used for prediction of HTCs within the deteriorated heat-transfer regime. An updated heat-transfer correlation is presented in this paper for forced convective heat transfer in the normal heat-transfer regime to supercritical water in a bare vertical tube. It has demonstrated a good fit (±25%) for the analyzed dataset. This correlation can be used for future comparisons with other independent datasets, with bundled data, for the verification of computer codes for SCWR core thermalhydraulics and for the verification of scaling parameters between water and modeling fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat transfer and supercritical fluidsFrench-language works237,207