MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078674248 · doi:10.2310/7750.2014.14038

Interleukin-17 Antagonists in the Treatment of Psoriasis

2015· review· en· W2078674248 on OpenAlexaff
Shivani Felicia Chandrakumar, Jensen Yeung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsWomen's College Hospital
FundersEli Lilly and CompanyAmgen
KeywordsMedicinePsoriasisDermatologyInterleukinInterleukin 17ImmunologyCytokine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disorder of unknown etiology. Interleukin (IL)-17a, a key product of the recently identified Th17 cell subset, has been found to play a critical role in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. IL-17 antagonists are a new class of biological agent currently in development for psoriasis that selectively inhibit IL-17a activity. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to summarize the current efficacy data from phase II randomized controlled trials of the IL-17 antagonists brodalumab, ixekizumab, and secukinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with IL-17 antagonists achieved marked reduction in psoriasis disease severity as demonstrated by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 response rates. A sizable proportion of patients treated with brodalumab and ixekizumab achieved unprecedented clinical clearance of their psoriasis (PASI > 90). These encouraging results demonstrate the efficacy of these agents and validate the pro-inflammatory role of IL-17 in the pathophysiology of psoriasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207