Heparan sulfate–dependent ERK activation contributes to the overexpression of fibrotic proteins and enhanced contraction by scleroderma fibroblasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the contribution of heparan sulfate proteoglycan and Ras/MEK/ERK to the overexpression of profibrotic proteins and the enhanced contractile ability of dermal fibroblasts from patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma). METHODS: The effects of the MEK/ERK inhibitor U0126, the heparan sulfate side chain formation inhibitor beta-xyloside, and soluble heparin on the overexpression of profibrotic genes were compared in fibroblasts from lesional skin of patients with diffuse SSc and fibroblasts from healthy control subjects. Identified protein expressions were compared with the contractile abilities of fibroblasts while they resided within a collagen lattice. Forces generated were measured using a culture force monitor. RESULTS: Inhibiting MEK/ERK with U0126 significantly reduced expression of a cohort of proadhesive and procontractile proteins that normally are overexpressed by scleroderma fibroblasts, including integrin alpha4 and integrin beta1. Antagonizing heparan sulfate side chain formation with beta-xyloside or the addition of soluble heparin prevented ERK activation, in addition to reducing the expression of these proadhesive/contractile proteins. Treatment with either U0126, beta-xyloside, or heparin resulted in a reduction in the overall peak contractile force generated by dermal fibroblasts. Blocking platelet-derived growth factor receptor with Gleevec (imatinib mesylate) reduced overall contractile ability and the elevated syndecan 4 expression and ERK activation in SSc fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that heparan sulfate-dependent ERK activation contributes to the enhanced contractile ability demonstrated by dermal fibroblasts from lesional skin of patients with scleroderma. These results are consistent with the notion that the MEK/ERK procontractile pathway is dysregulated in scleroderma dermal fibroblasts. Additionally, the results suggest that antagonizing the MEK/ERK pathway is likely to modulate heparan sulfate proteoglycan activity, which in turn may have a profound effect on the fibrotic response in SSc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".