MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A review of the medical treatment of primary aldosteronism

2001· review· en· W2078741210 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrimary aldosteronismSpironolactoneAldosteroneHyperaldosteronismAngiotensin receptorAdverse effectInternal medicineAngiotensin Receptor BlockersPharmacologyBioinformaticsAngiotensin IIRenin–angiotensin systemReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Use of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) has suggested that at least one in 10 hypertensive subjects have primary aldosteronism (PA). There is thus a timely need to review the literature for effective drug therapies and to speculate on other therapeutic options by taking into account recent advances in understanding of the PA disease pathophysiological process. DATA SOURCE: A MEDLINE and EMBASE search of all articles published from the start of the databases until July 1999 and reviews of the bibliographies of textbooks. STUDY SELECTION: Primary research articles on the medical treatment of PA with emphasis on diagnosis, treatment option, drug dosage, therapeutic response and adverse drug effect. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design and quality were assessed. Relevant data on diagnostic methodology, drug usage and response were analysed and compared. DATA SYNTHESIS: A select number of subjects with aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) can be expected to respond well to surgical treatment For the majority of PA cases especially subjects with idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA), long-term medical treatment is now safe and feasible although no randomized controlled trials have been carried out to date. The best therapeutic response is obtained by directly antagonizing aldosterone at the receptor level using medium to low dose spironolactone and this response can be predicted by a raised ARR. The response to other potassium-sparing diuretics and calcium channel blockers are modest. IHA responds better than angiotensin II-unresponsive APA to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and this may also be true with angiotensin II receptor blockers. The discovery of the aldosterone synthase gene opens up the possibility for gene therapy. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of PA allows appropriate management with resultant blood pressure control in many hypertensive subjects who otherwise have resistant hypertension despite multiple drug therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it