MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078762225 · doi:10.4236/am.2013.412217

Analytical Solution of Substrate Concentration in the Biosensor Response

2013· article· en· W2078762225 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Ali Madani Tonekaboni, Ali Shahbazi Mastan Abad, Amin Afshari, Ali Khalilzadeh, Shahab Karimi, Mitra Shabanisamghabady

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mathematics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosensorDimensionless quantityHomotopy analysis methodSubstrate (aquarium)DiffusionKineticsHomotopy perturbation methodBiological systemEnzyme kineticsChemistryReaction–diffusion systemMathematicsMaterials scienceThermodynamicsHomotopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyPhysicsMathematical analysisNanotechnologyEnzymeClassical mechanicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Homotopy analysis method (HAM) is employed to investigate amperometric biosensor at mixed enzyme kinetics and diffusion limitation. Mathematical modeling of the problem is developed utilizing non-Michaelis-Menten kinetics of the enzymatic reaction. Different results of the problem are obtained for different values of the dimensionless parameters. Accuracy of the obtained results is verified by comparing them with the available actual and simulated ones. It is concluded that the obtained solution can be considered as a promising one to investigate different aspects of the phenomena.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied MathematicsSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207