MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078767206 · doi:10.1118/1.4734718

SU‐E‐I‐04: Implementation of a Fast Monte Carlo Scatter Correction for Cone‐ Beam Computed Tomography

2012· article· en· W2078767206 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Watson, Ernesto Mainegra‐Hing, E Soisson, Jan Seuntjens

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Radiography and Imaging
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomMonte Carlo methodCone beam computed tomographyImage qualityVoxelAttenuationScannerProjection (relational algebra)Iterative reconstructionImage-guided radiation therapyOpticsCorrection for attenuationComputer sciencePhysicsMedical imagingAlgorithmComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputed tomographyImage (mathematics)MedicineStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans by implementation of a fast and accurate MC-based scatter correction algorithm. METHODS: A Solid WaterTM phantom was imaged on a Varian OBI CBCT scanner using the standard-dose head protocol (100 kVp, 151 mAs, partial-angle). A fast Monte Carlo simulation developed in the EGSnrc framework was used to transport photons through the uncorrected CBCT scan. From the simulation output, the contribution from both primary and scattered photons for each projection image was estimated. Using these estimates, a subtractive scatter correction was performed on the CBCT projection data. This correction procedure was repeated iteratively, using the previous scatter corrected scan as input to the Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Implementation of the scatter correction algorithm on real CBCT data was shown to help mitigate scatter-induced artifacts, such as cupping and streaking. The scatter corrected images were also shown to have improved accuracy in reconstructed attenuation coefficient values. In a region of interest centered on the Solid Water phantom, the number of voxels agreeing to within 10% of the theoretical attenuation coefficient increased from 46% to 97% after two iterations of the scatter correction. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the proposed scatter correction algorithm is successful in improving image quality in real CBCT images. The accuracy of the attenuation coefficients extracted from the corrected CBCT scan renders the data suitable for on-the-fly dose recalculations, as well as vastly improved image registration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicDental Radiography and ImagingFrench-language works237,207