MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The assessment and evolution of offshore gas hydrate deposits using seafloor controlled source electromagnetic methodology

2010· article· en· W2078779307 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueOCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineSeafloor spreadingGeologyPetroleum engineeringClathrate hydrateElectromagnetic heatingMarine engineeringOceanographySeabedHydrateEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural gas hydrates are ice-like solids that occur worldwide in seafloor sediments typically along active continental margins. They consist of gas molecules, mainly methane, contained in a cage-like, clathrate structure of water molecules. They form under low temperature and high pressure conditions, typically offshore in the uppermost few hundred metres of sediment in water depth exceeding about 500 m. The global abundance of methane frozen in hydrate exceeds the amount of all other known fossil hydrocarbon resources. Gas hydrates are a source of a large volume of methane gas and are recognized as an important possible future energy resource. Marine controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) methods, sensitive to variations in resistivity, have become an important and valuable tool in the detection of offshore hydrate Hydrate is a resistive target. It increases the formation resistivity of a sediment layer if it forms in sufficient quantity to block previously interconnected pore spaces. Controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) methods depend on a simple concept of physics. If a time varying EM field is generated at or near the seafloor, then eddy currents are induced in the sea water and subjacent crust in accordance with Faraday's law. The outward progress of the currents with time depends on range and electrical conductivity of the surroundings. In particular, the apparent speed in the sea water will be slower than that in the less conductive crustal zones. Measurements at a remote location of the electric and magnetic fields associated with the eddy currents may be inverted for the crustal resistivity structure including local anomalous concentrations of hydrate. Our CSEM system has been used successfully to map hydrate on the Cascadia Margin, to the west of Vancouver Island, British Columbia. The area, a convergent margin, is the focus of intensive studies on gas hydrates which have been identified on seismic sections, by direct sampling and from the analyses of cores and logs collected by the Ocean Drilling Programs. It has also been used in New Zealand in a similar geologic setting. The next stage in the research is the monitoring of one of more deposits as a function of time in this case several years. The objective is the understanding of how hydrate is formed and how it evolves. It requires the installation of equipment on the seafloor which is locally powered and which can communicate with an onshore base. Neptune Canada provides the infrastructure for the experiment. It is a Canadian subsea observatory network consisting of a cable linking several nodes to a terminal on Vancouver Island. The cable carries power and high speed ethernet interconnectivity. Instruments, including the CSEM apparatus have been connected to the nodes and data may be collected from them in real time. The CSEM array spans a known gas hydrate deposit. The engineering of both the network and the CSEM system is described together with a numerical model study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it