MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078782951 · doi:10.1142/s0217979201007506

A PREISACH ANALYSIS OF IRREVERSIBILITY IN A PARTICULATE THIN FILM: <font>Fe</font>-<font>Al</font><sub>2</sub><font>O</font><sub>3</sub>

2001· article· en· W2078782951 on OpenAlexaff
C. Harder, Tielei Song, R. M. Roshko, Shihui Ge, Meizhen Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics B · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFontBistabilityHysteresisField (mathematics)PhysicsMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present measurements of some of the principal response functions of a thin film of nanodimensional Fe particles embedded in A l2 O 3, specifically the temperature dependence of the moment measured under field cooled and zero field cooled conditions at temperatures between 5 K ≤ T ≤ 300 K in a low applied field ha =10 Oe , and the major hysteresis loop measured at T =5 K in applied fields between -2000 Oe ≤ h a ≤ + 2000 Oe . The data were analyzed within the framework of a generalized version of the Preisach model of hysteresis, which treats all magnetic systems as ensembles of interacting bistable Barkhausen elements, and which includes both thermal barrier relaxation effects and critical effects. Numerical simulations based on the model are able to replicate the principal structural features of the experimental data, and allow us to extract the characteristics of the bistable elements, specifically their moments μ, their coercive fields h c and their interaction fields h i .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics BSame topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207