MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078820497 · doi:10.1068/b33093

VecGCA: A Vector-Based Geographic Cellular Automata Model Allowing Geometric Transformations of Objects

2008· article· en· W2078820497 on OpenAlexaffabout
Niandry Moreno, André Ménard, Danielle J. Marceau

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment and Planning B Planning and Design · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCellular automatonPolygon (computer graphics)Raster graphicsRaster dataComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)Geographic information systemObject (grammar)Vector mapTransformation (genetics)Geometric modelingAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceGeographyCartographyMathematicsArtificial intelligenceGeometryFrame (networking)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellular automata (CA) can reproduce global patterns and behavior from local interactions of cells and they are used increasingly to simulate complex natural and human systems. Among their attributes are their computational simplicity and their explicit representation of space and time. However, the classic definition of CA limits their application to problems that involve a discrete space, and similar rules and neighborhoods for all cells. In addition, the standard raster-based CA model is sensitive to spatial scale. This paper presents a new vector-based geographic cellular automata model, called the VecGCA model, which defines space as a collection of irregular geographic objects. Each object has a geometric representation (a polygon) that evolves through time according to a transition function that depends on the influence of neighboring polygons. In this model, the neighborhood is defined as the region of influence on each geographic object, and the neighbors are all geographic objects located within the region of influence. An innovative aspect of the VecGCA model is that the procedure allows geometric transformation of objects. The area of a polygon (representing an object) is reduced in the region that is nearest to the neighbor that exerts an influence on it, and the area of that neighbor is increased accordingly. The proposed model was tested with real data and compared with a raster-based CA model to simulate land-use changes in an agroforested area in southern Quebec, Canada. The model was validated using two land-use maps, produced from satellite Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery, which were acquired in 1999 and 2002. The results obtained show that VecGCA can represent well the dynamics in the study area through an adequate evolution of the geometry of the geographic objects which are independent of the cell size, whereas, to generate similar outcomes in the raster-based CA model, a sensitivity analysis must be conducted to determine which cell size is needed. The geometric transformation procedure introduced in the VecGCA model executes the change of shape of a geographic object by changing its state in a portion of its surface, allowing a more realistic representation of the evolution of the landscape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironment and Planning B Planning and DesignSame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207