MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078828946 · doi:10.1115/imece2010-38710

Investigation of the 3D Velocity Field of a Segmented Flow Utilizing a Novel 3C3D Micro-PIV Approach

2010· article· en· W2078828946 on OpenAlexaff
Mona Abdolrazaghi, David S. Nobes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlug flowMicrofluidicsFlow (mathematics)MechanicsMaterials scienceChannel (broadcasting)Flow velocityOpen-channel flowMonolithComputer scienceTwo-phase flowNanotechnologyPhysicsChemistryTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Segmented flow occurs in several microfluidic systems such as monolith reactors, cellular systems, and human airways. Liquid-gas bubbles can cause different issues in the micro-channel by disturbing the flow and even blocking the channel. Investigating this kind of flow phenomenon provides useful information for improving the efficiency of both industrial and biomedical devices. Predicting the velocity of bubbles, velocity within the liquid slug and the thickness of the thin liquid film in the slug flow is one of the challenges in this field. In this paper, a novel measurement technique capable of measuring three components of the velocity is described and used to investigate the flow in the region of the gas-fluid interface of a segmented flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationFrench-language works237,207